Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs David Jorda Sanchis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Sanchis analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs David Jorda Sanchis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Sanchis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 49.26% of points on their second serve, while Sanchis has won 47.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.12% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sanchis has won 46.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.35% and 29.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 60.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sanchis has saved 64.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 36/ 32), with Sanchis winning 44.26% (W/L 27/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 194), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sanchis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 164/ 120), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 15/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.11% of matches (W/L 23/ 22), where as Sanchis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46% of matches (W/L 23/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 1 times and Sanchis being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Sanchis winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Sanchis was at the M15 Piombino, 29-08-2019, Second, Hard with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Sanchis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Sanchis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Sanchis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.72 while Sanchis has played against players with an average rank of 303.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sanchis has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 38.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sanchis has converted 45.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
198
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
326
Rank
292
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
57% (343-257)
Career Total W/L
55% (268-215)
42% (10-14)
YTD W/L
39% (11-17)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$10,165
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | David Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (32/56) | 57% (24/42) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (20/32) | 46% (11/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (15/24) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (24/42) | 38% (21/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | David Jorda Sanchis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (10/14) | 39% (11/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (25/30) | 43% (29/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (249/272) | 51% (331/323) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 35% (6/11) | 40% (6/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 151 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.58 | 315.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (981/1521) | 62% (1323/2141) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (673/981) | 72% (952/1323) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (266/540) | 47% (385/818) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (50/131) | 46% (72/157) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (575/1563) | 36% (719/1992) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 29% (2/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 43% (9/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 39% (11/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 21% (3/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (12/9) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (12/3) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 13% (15/2) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
David Jorda Sanchis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Antoine Hoang
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Jaime Faria
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
7 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
62%
(
78 of
126)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
48 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
121
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Sanchis Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fatic are available here and Sanchis photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nerman Fatic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
